• http://superstarcreative.blogspot.com neil simpson

    er….sorry to be contentious, but you have just described realistic goal setting…not benchmarking.

    Benchmarking is noticing what already happens at current levels ie. I read an average of 25 blog posts a week. Thats a benchmark, then you measure your aspiration activity levels against that. ie. adding your 5 extra reads per day. and then measuring your new readings against your established benchmark…the tracking of progress.

  • http://shanelyang.com/blogs/articles/ Shanel Yang

    Benchmarking sounds like a great way to get going when you really hate to get started on a project! And, for people who can get going but want to maximize their efforts to their full potential, there’s the awesome productivity book “Eat that Frog!,” summarized at http://shanelyang.com/2008/06/02/eat-that-frog/ : )

  • http://www.cindysense.com Overcoming Lifes Obstacles

    According to Dictionary.com Benchmark means:
    1. A standard by which something can be measured or judged:
    2. often bench mark A surveyor’s mark made on a stationary object of previously determined position and elevation and used as a reference point in tidal observations and surveys.

    According to Wikipedia …
    1. Benchmarking in simplistic terms is the process where you compare your process with that of a better process and try to improve the standard of the process you follow to improve quality of the system, product, services etc.

    2. A process similar to benchmarking is also used in technical product testing and in land surveying. See the article benchmark for these applications.

    The way I read these definitions both Neil (comment 1) and Hunter – Author are correct.

    Hunter, I loved the article. Now maybe I’ll get my book read! Truly simplicity is the answer to getting things done. For some reason our natural instint is to make things harder to achieve than they really are.

  • http://hunternuttall.com Hunter Nuttall

    Neil, I’m sure people use the same terms to mean different things. If you don’t agree with this definition, then fine–let’s just consider the concept.

    The way I’m using it here is different from realistic goal setting, because even realistic goals are going to be higher than your minimum standards. I agree that observing current levels is very helpful for setting goals.

  • http://hunternuttall.com Hunter Nuttall

    Shanel, absolutely! It’s hard to get started when you’re looking at this big project you don’t want to do, but it’s a lot easier when you think “all I have to do is one little part every day.”

  • http://hunternuttall.com Hunter Nuttall

    Thanks for looking up the definitions. Like I said to Neil, I’m sure there are different definitions floating around out there. I picked up this term from an organization that was big on using it, and they consisted of several thousand people. But if you have a different word to describe the same idea, I think that’s fine.

  • http://www.somedaysyndrome.com Alex Fayle

    That’s a great way to approach things Hunter – it’s all about the action – thinking or planning or wanting do not accomplish things – only steady action.

    People have to choose to act, then measure the actions to make sure they’re moving forward.

    Well done!
    Alex

  • http://hunternuttall.com Hunter Nuttall

    Alex, I’m all for thinking, planning, and wanting, in order to help us decide what actions to take. But far too often, people get stuck in those states, and forget that only action will make things happen. It’s really true that slow and steady often wins the race.

  • http://www.pickthebrain.com Peter

    Thanks for the article Hunter. This is an interesting technique you have described.

    I must admit, I have had some trouble lately “getting things done”. Like you suggest, I think sometimes it is necessary to be tough on ourselves. Postponing things until tomorrow, or some unspecified day in the future, is a bad habit that often results in that “thing” never getting done at all.

  • http://hunternuttall.com Hunter Nuttall

    I can relate, Peter. Getting things done is bound to be tough for pretty much everyone. While I generally try to be laid back about things, I’ll use benchmarking on certain projects that I want to be sure to make good progress on. It definitely works, but it can also be overwhelming if you use it on everything.

  • http://www.dietmindspirit.org/2008/09/02/learn-how-to-get-things-done/ Learn How to Get Things Done | Diet Mind Spirit

    [...] Read the rest Share and Enjoy: [...]

  • http://withopenheart.blogspot.com Open Heart

    It’s a good concept.
    You should start by deciding what you really want to do, your key objectives.
    Then break them down into actionable things.
    And then set your ‘benchmark’.

  • http://hunternuttall.com Hunter Nuttall

    That’s right, Open Heart. Objectives are often too abstract to apply benchmarking to, until we break them down into actionable items.

  • http://www.simpleology.com/blog Bean Jones

    I’ve been practicing something similar that I learned from software engineers.

    You can check it out here: http://www.simpleology.com/blog/2008/05/boxing_up_time_gets_things_don_1.html

    My productivity definitely increased so now I have more time for a life outside of work. :-)

  • http://shahtraining.com/if-its-not-measurable-then-its-not-manageable/ If It’s Not Measurable, Then It’s Not Manageable – The Basics of Fitness and Nutrition for a Simple Lifestyle

    [...] answer. I went to the Crossfit forum to pose the same exact question, and they referred me to their benchmark workouts. Benchmark workouts are simply workouts that are used to measure progress and appear in [...]

  • http://successprofessor.ca/2009/03/29/sunday-browsing-sprinting-towards-your-life-goals/ Sunday Browsing: Sprinting Towards Your Life Goals | The Success Professor

    [...] Learn how to use Benchmarks to reach success from Pick The [...]