• http://www.iamsheamus.com Sheamus

    I think all you really need are Google and Wikipedia, to be honest.

    I don’t understand why *anybody* uses Yahoo Answers – why not just Google your question? Or use Wikipedia? It’s all there if you know how to look.

    And I think that’s it in a nutshell; even in these heady days, most people – I would estimate as many as 90 per cent of everyday folk – still don’t know how to use a search engine properly.

  • http://www.totalselfimprovement.com/ Self Improvement

    Hi Tony,

    Thanks for the tips. I had not heard of “Scholarpedia” before. I had used the others before. “How Stuff Works” used to be really good. Then it went through a stage of having more ads than content. Now it seems to have found a good balance and is a great site for young and old alike.

    Geoff

  • http://www.tutor.com/vip235 Julie

    Regarding Yahoo Answers:
    If all you want is the answer, are you really learning anything? Tutor.com Direct’s tutors take you step-by-step through the problem so that you understand it.

    In the interest of full disclosure, I should let you know I am a client services manager at Tutor.com. I have worked here for a number of years, and can attest to the quality of this company. I have a special promotion code which I am happy to share, which will give you 50 minutes for free: http://www.tutor.com/vip235.

  • Bachaque

    Your “Google operators” link will link to admin page of the blog.
    Now, that out of the way…Thanks a lot.
    I wasn’t aware of scholarpedia,either.
    I have about 20 search engine plug-ins on my firefox and i use about half of them very frequently. Some are very spesific like certain dictionaries and databases.
    Sometimes expert or anectodal knowledge is not easily found on broad-rangers, that’s when spesific databeses, wiki’s etc. come in handy.

  • http://thoughtsintime.co.za Albert (http://thoughtsintime.co.za/)

    Thanks Tony, that was really useful!

  • Britt

    Wikipedia is a great place to FIND sources, but you should definitely track down the source yourself and at least skim through find the fact that you are going to be using—if for no other reason than to make sure that whatever anonymous idiot put the fact onto the Wikipedia article got it right!

    Citing a source that YOU have not read is not considered academically honest. (Though I’m not saying that it’s not a shortcut that researchers often take.)

    —One of those annoying “instructors.”

  • http://www.romanadvice.com Roman

    Great picks. I prefer using Google scholar ever given it a go?

  • http://pimpyourgrades.com Tony Howell

    Roman,

    Thanks.

    I haven’t used Google Scholar too much since my college provides free access to a bunch of journal databases, but it does seem like it could be another useful tool.

  • AA

    Yahoo answers can be useful for very specific questions you can’t find information on from Google. For example, a friend needed information about the way a certain shoe was supposed to fit – google searches answered “near” her question, but she wasn’t able to find any information specific to her situation. On YA, she was able to describe her situation and get opinions. Granted, they have to be taken with a grain of salt (or sometimes a salt lick :)

  • http://stanleybronstein.com MrAchievement.com (Stanley Bronstein)

    Thanks. I wasn’t aware of Scholarpedia. I’ll have to check it out in the future.

    I love how some experts say that Wikipedia contains mistakes. Heck, encyclopedias contain mistakes too. The bottom line is that Wikipedia has enough sets of eyeballs looking everything over such that lots of things wind up getting corrected.

    Personally, I love all the research materials we have available right at our fingertips. It makes it so much easier to write my books and do my blogging.

    Stanley F. Bronstein
    MrAchievement
    Attorney, CPA, Author & Speaker
    Official Guide to Achievement on SelfGrowth.com

  • http://www.jeetblog.com Abhijeet from Jeet Blog

    I think Wikipedia and How stuff works are 2 incredible websites which no other website can beat. I can’t imagine my day without visiting wikipedia at least once.

  • http://studenthacks.org/2008/04/18/links-6/ Link Friday – April 18, 2008 | studenthacks.org

    [...] Your Individual Development Plan Lifehack.org provides helpful advice on how to develop a personal development plan. [...]

  • Samantha

    None of these sources are acceptable in a research paper… unless you find something with more credibility through Google Scholar.

  • http://www.littleredsbigideas.typepad.com Jodi Rudick

    As a business professional, I can’t live without LinkedIn. If you want to get information and ideas about business related questions and issues it is a fantastic resource. I also think that the ability to learn about the background and “resume” of the person who submitted the information is critical. Thanks for the list!

  • http://sirjorge.com/blogx sir jorge

    those are definitely great links, thank you

  • jimi

    I find it sad so many people think Wikipedia
    will give the accurate or correct answers.

    I will stick with research sources with a bit more credibility, thanks.

    We have enough MIS-information already,
    thanks to the media, including the internet.

  • pete

    teach me

  • http://damien-roche.com DamienRoche

    Google is kind of in a category of it’s own. It’s a search engine, and so indexes all the other sites. It probably searches those sites better than their own searches.

  • Amanda

    How about… ask a reference librarian? They are amazing fonts of knowledge, can direct you to great sources, and can answer questions that you don’t even know how to ask. It’s shameful that “9 websites” can even be close to satisfying “all your research needs.”

  • mhatling

    ask mom and dad.
    ask me.
    time travel.

  • Anonymous

    This post is pure ignorance, as another commenter mentioned none of these are acceptable in a research paper.  Contact your local library about databases.

  • Anonymous

    Google scholar is an index.  It is a great resource, but is only useful if you are using it through a library that has purchased access to the content.